Uefifix.info - Desktop power supply?

25th of March 2013 4

Desktop power supply?

Question by TheGuyNumber4: Desktop power supply?
How much power would I need and how’d you rate this out of ten?

ASUS M5A97 AM3+ AMD 970 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard with UEFI BIOS

EVGA 01G-P3-1361-KR GeForce GTX 460 (Fermi) 1GB 192-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card

AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core Desktop Processor FD8120FRGUBOX

G.SKILL Ripjaws Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800) Desktop Memory Model F3-12800CL9D-8GBRL

Best answer:

Answer by Andrew
Get the Corsair AX 750W Its great. Fully Modular. 750W. High Amps.

What do you think? Answer below!

Filed under § Uefi Motherboards — Tagged with , , ,

Share it!

Was it good for you to?

Sponsors

Support for the site!

No sponsors at the moment.



4 great comment(s) for this post

  1. Rocky 3:28 pm 25/03 of 2013

    550W

    Reply
  2. garrytoo 3:42 pm 25/03 of 2013

    I would suggest 800w power supply it may be a little overpowered , better to have a little more than not enough. As far as your system if you are using the correct hard drive I would give it a 9. I suspect you are using windows 7 64 bit.. Good selection of products have fun.

    Reply
  3. Jacob 3:47 pm 25/03 of 2013

    I would recommend at least 550W would and should be more than adequate. _Jacob

    I would not go over 550W because everything will overheat and then you’ll have other issues.

    Reply
  4. Frag Master 4:13 pm 25/03 of 2013

    I rate it a waste of time and money that could of been better spent on a real DX11 gaming rig with a much better future path.

    Read this and ask yourself why AMD whose watt sucking CPUs bottle neck high end GPU, WHY?

    Performance Analysis

    With the addition of numbers for the Intel Core i3-2100 and Core i5-2400 in some of our benchmarks, it’s plain to see that even with a price cut, the FX-8120 struggles in most of our tests. In very multi-threaded tests such as Cinebench and WPrime, it just about manages to hold its own against the similarly-priced Intel Core i5-2400 – slightly ahead in WPrime, a little behind in Cinebench and noticeably faster than the cheaper Core i3-2100. The Core i5-3570K is much faster in both tests, but then it costs around £30 more.

    Our image editing test was a real let down with the FX-8120. It came bottom of the graph, being trounced by a staggering 500 points by the Core i3-2100 – a CPU that costs just £90. Even the ageing AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition was considerably faster while the similarly priced Intel Core i5-2400 was nearly twice as fast. Clearly, if you do any amount of photo editing, the AMD FX-8120 represents particularly poor value.

    With eight cores at its disposal, you’d think the FX-8120 might stand a good chance in our video encoding test. Sadly this wasn’t to be and its score of 2,150 was over 400 points short of the Core i5-2400. Thankfully for the FX-8120, the Core i3-2100 was noticeably slower, with its two physical and two virtual cores not able to keep up.

    Everything started to fall away from the FX-8120 again in our multi-tasking test, where it was yet again at the bottom of the pile, coming 100 points short of the much cheaper Core i3-2100, while the Core i5-2400 was nearly 50% faster – pretty damning result. Overall, it was no surprise to see the FX-8120 rock bottom, bettered by the Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition and Core i3-2100 and trounced by the Core i5-2400.

    Our game test lacks data for the two Sandy Bridge CPUs as we tested these some time ago, however, with the Intel Core i5-3570K retailing for just £30-40 more, it’s clear from our results that the FX-8120 isn’t a great buy for games either. The Intel CPU was 60 per cent faster in Arma II while costing around 30 per cent more – not a bad rate of return if you can afford the extra layout.

    Conclusion,

    Sadly, its more of the same bad news for AMD or anyone with a Socket AM3+ motherboard looking for a decent CPU for around the £150 mark. The FX-8120 just isn’t a good choice when it comes to the kind of applications we run on our PCs. It’s regularly outpaced by far cheaper Intel dual-core CPUs, while the similarly-priced Intel Core i5-2400 is significantly faster in many of our tests. It’s not all bad news for AMD – before we get accused of being biased towards Intel, we have no qualms recommending the A8-3870K for those looking to build a budget gaming PC, while we also recommend many of its graphics cards.

    As it stands, the FX-8120 will have to be a lot cheaper for it to be worth considering over an equivalently-priced Intel setup, while owners of the Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition can rest assured that there aren’t any worthwhile upgrades yet.

    Reply

Your opinion matters. Add it below.


Tip: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Categories



Copyright uefifix.info since 2010. All rights reserved. Design and the Absolute Theme by Tommie Hansen.